INFLUENCE OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION PRACTICES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR ON PROMOTING GOVERNANCE IN  EXECUTIVE ARM OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MANDERA

ISSACK MAALIM SURAW; NAOMI NDUTA NJOROGE

doi:10.61426/rjssh.v4i1.134

ISSACK MAALIM SURAW Mount Kenya University, Kenya
NAOMI NDUTA NJOROGE, PhD Mount Kenya University, Kenya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/rjssh.v4i1.134

Keywords: Learning and Improvement, Data Collecting and Analysis, Stakeholders Involvement

Abstract

There is a lack of focus on the cultural, social, and economic factors that may influence the effectiveness of M&E systems in these contexts. The main objective of the study was to analyze influence of effective monitoring and evaluation practices in the public sector on promoting governance in Mandera County. A descriptive research design was used. This study targeted 150 respondents which made up the target population. A stratified random sampling method was used. The sample size was 108 respondents. The analysis of the data used both quantitative and qualitative methods. The SPSS software, version 26 was used to evaluate quantitative data using descriptive statistics. The study findings were significance to County Government Officials, County Government Employees, Monitoring and Evaluation Practitioners, Citizens and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Development Partners and Donor Agencies, Researchers and Academics. The study found out that, respondents tend to agree to some extent that continuous learning and improvement led to regular analysis and reporting, but the response remains somewhat neutral. The mean score of 1.7980 suggested that, on average, respondents agreed more with the statement that collecting and analysing data had led to good governance. Respondents, on average, agreed more with the statement that stakeholders' involvement had led to collaborative partnerships, as indicated by a mean score of 2.4444. The study concluded that rrespondents appeared to be somewhat neutral or leaning towards agreement regarding regular analysis, feedback loops, and regular feedback resulting from continuous learning and improvement efforts. Respondents generally agreed that collecting and analysing data had had positive impacts on decision making, particularly in areas related to clarity of objectives, time management, and risk management. Respondents generally agreed that stakeholder involvement had positive impacts on collaborative partnerships, regular communication, empowerment, and an improved feedback mechanism. Organizations should continue to emphasize and prioritize good governance practices, as these are perceived positively by respondents. The study recommended that given that respondents view continuous improvement as positively impacting capacity and flexibility, organizations should continue to invest in and emphasize these aspects of their continuous improvement initiatives, as they were seen as strengths. The neutral response regarding improved data quality suggests that organizations should focus on quality control and assurance measures in their data collection and analysis processes to ensure that data integrity and reliability are maintained. Organizations should recognize and leverage positive aspects of stakeholder involvement, particularly in fostering collaborative partnerships, communication, empowerment, and feedback mechanisms.

Author Biographies

ISSACK MAALIM SURAW, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

Student, Masters of Arts in Monitoring and Evaluation

NAOMI NDUTA NJOROGE, PhD, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

Lecturer

References

Alidu, L., Awumbila, M., & Dake, F. A. (2021). Enhancing the role of monitoring and evaluation in local governance: Evidence from Ghana. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(2), 308-330. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1681164.

Araral, E. (2018). Learning from the local: Public participation and good governance in developing Asia. Public Administration and Development, 38(2), 87-97. doi:10.1002/pad.1806.

Ayee, J. R. A., & Yin, G. (2014). The challenges of monitoring and evaluating public sector reforms in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Public Administration and Development, 34(3), 161-174.

Azfar, O., & Khwaja, A. I. (2019). Can good governance be imported? Evidence from institutional reforms in Pakistan. World Development, 116, 167-181. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.004

Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2016). The road to Paris: Contested logics and political dynamics in the emergence of a new climate agreement. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12-22.

Belghitar, Y., & Boubakri, N. (2021). Corporate governance and monitoring mechanisms: Evidence from family firms. Journal of Business Research, 131, 228-242. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.011

Bhattacherjee, D., & Chakraborty, S. K. (2017). Evaluation of public sector performance in developing countries: A review of theoretical and empirical literature. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 3(2), 145-167. doi: 10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.086308.

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.

Fenton, A., Wilson, E., & Fox, C. (2020). The effect of monitoring and evaluation on program outcomes in a low-income setting: A mixed-methods study of a maternal and child health program in Malawi. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 820. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05652-4.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 663-671.

Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(S1), s3-s28. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12017

Gorgonio, R. E., & Patulot, G. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of public sector programs and services: A systematic review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 88, 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101965

Herrera, V. M., & Postero, N. G. (2019). Participation and good governance in Bolivia and Ecuador: Exploring the limits of inclusion. Latin American Politics and Society, 61(3), 25-47. doi:10.1111/laps.12174.

Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93-109.

Huddleston, B., Kusek, J. Z., & Armstrong, E. M. (2020). Results-oriented monitoring and evaluation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Practices, challenges, and prospects. Evaluation and Program Planning, 80, 101778. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101778.

Jabbour, L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Latan, H., & Teixeira, A. A. (2020). Learning, innovation, and environmental performance in public organizations: A study in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121170. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121170.

Jaggers, J., & Makarin, A. (2019). Learning from development practice: Evaluating governance interventions in fragile states. Governance, 32(3), 539-558. doi:10.1111/gove.12380.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kamaluddin, A., Rahman, H. M. T., & Chowdhury, M. N. U. (2019). The impact of community participation on good governance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 428-440. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1395463

Kim, Y. J., Lee, M., & Moon, M. J. (2018). Learning and good governance: The effects of university-based executive education programs on public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 80-90. doi:10.1111/puar.12824

Krafchik, W. (2015). Accountability, transparency and participation: Key building blocks for governance. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 4(1), 32-41. doi: 10.22495/jgrv4i1p4

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2014). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: A handbook for development practitioners. World Bank Publications.

Lapp, M., Khagram, S., & Mohan, P. (2019). Does participation in local governance lead to greater accountability? Evidence from South India. World Development, 123, 104606. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104606.

Lundgren, M., & McMakin, A. H. (2018). Risk communication, inclusiveness, and trust: Keys to resilient water utility governance and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 220, 126-134. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.062

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.

OECD. (2015). The governance of public sector evaluations: Evidence from the international community. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=GAD(2015)2&docLanguage=En

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.

Rahim, A. (2020). Decision-making transparency and corruption control in developing countries: A panel data analysis. Public Integrity, 22(5), 519-531. doi:10.1080/10999922.2019.1627264.

Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Ramkumar, V. (2019). Inclusion and democracy in participatory governance: Evidence from India. Governance, 32(4), 729-745. doi:10.1111/gove.12383

Ramanathan, T., & Prakash, R. (2020). Monitoring and evaluation practices in public sector organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(3), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0218

Roberts, A. (2016). The politics of transparency: The management of secrecy and disclosure in organizations. Routledge.

Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-139.

Sarker, S., & Xiao, J. (2021). Promoting good governance through decision-making transparency and participation: Evidence from Bangladesh. Public Administration and Development, 41(1), 25-36. doi:10.1002/pad.1876

Sanderson, M. R., & Lonsdale, M. D. (2017). Linking learning, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem-based management. Bioscience, 67(5), 384-394. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix020

Shen, Y., & Chen, C. (2019). Learning and diffusion of good governance in China: Evidence from a survey of county government websites. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1472-1491. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1496798.

Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Allegretti, G. (2019). The impact of participatory budgeting on good governance and social accountability. Journal of Public Deliberation, 15(1), article 1. Available at: https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol15/iss1/art1/.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.

Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.

Tirole, J. (1986). Hierarchies and bureaucracies: On the role of collusion in organizations. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2(2), 181-214.

UNDP (2020.). Public Sector Reforms: A study by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) examined the role of M&E in public sector reforms in the Asia-Pacific region. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/poverty-reduction/public-sector-reforms.html

World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank Publications.

World Bank. (2016). Monitoring and evaluation: Some tools, methods & approaches. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/sites/default/files/Data/reports/m-and-e-toolkit-2016.pdf.

Yan, A., Zhang, J., & Gao, J. (2018). The effects of group decision-making on firm performance: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 91, 151-162.