SECURITY AND MULTI-AGENCY APPROACHES IN COMBATING CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN NAIROBI CITY COUNTY, KENYA
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of multi-agency approaches in combating corruption in the public service in Nairobi City, Kenya and assess the legal framework used in multi-agency procedures, examine the capacity of personnel, and analyze institutional dynamics in combating corruption in the Public Service in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study also analyzed the role of chapter six of the Kenyan constitution on the effectiveness of multi-agency approaches of fighting corruption. This study was based on the principal-agent theory and the institutional theory and adopted a descriptive survey research design. From target population of 1021 staff of EACC, ODPP, FRC, ARA and the DCI, stratified random sampling and simple random sampling were used to obtain a statistically significant sample of 218 respondents. Questionnaires were adopted in gathering primary data after testing for both reliability (r=0.712) and validity and key informant interview with various heads of departments conducted to obtain qualitative data to corroborate the findings from the questionnaire. The quantitative data were analyzed using a multiple regression and qualitative data organized into themes and excerpts reported in verbatim. The study's first specific objective was to evaluate the legal framework in multi- agency procedures in combating corruption in the Public Service in Nairobi city County, Kenya. From the findings the study concluded that legal framework has a positive and significant influence on combating corruption. This was indicated by the p value of 0.000 and the positive regression coefficient of 1.230. The second specific objective of the study examined the role of training of personnel in combating corruption in the Public Service in Nairobi city County, Kenya. From the findings, the study concluded that Personnel training have a significant effect on combating corruption based on p value of 0.000 and regression coefficient of 0.703. The third specific objective of the study analyzed the institutional dynamics in combating corruption in the Public Service in Nairobi city County, Kenya. The study concluded that institutional dynamics have significant and positive effect on combating corruption based on the p value of 0.000 and coefficient of 0.215. The study recommended that a comprehensive legal framework outlining the level of collaborations among anti-corruption bodies be developed to deal with duplication of roles and limited powers, joint trainings should be conducted in order to align their skills so they could jointly fight against corruption effectively and the legal framework should be enhanced to allow the anti-corruption institutions to fully exercise its mandate devoid from political interference.
References
McAdam, D., & Scott, P. (2004). Organizations and movements: In Social Movements and Organization Theory.
Gauld, R. (2018). Principal- Agent Theory of Organizations. Springer Link.
Muthini, N.J. (2018). Challenges Encountered by Scene of Crime Investigators: the case of the Direcorate of Criminal Investigations Headquarters, Nairobi. Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Global Corruption Barometer. (2019). What People Think: Corruption in the Middle East . Transparency International.
Isaac, P. (2013). Combating Public Sector Corruption in Ghana: The case of the Public Procurement Act (2003) . University of Ghana.
Kichwen, E. K. (2017). The effectiveness of Anti-corruption Strategies : A Kenyan Case Study. United States International University.
McCann, B. (2019). Models for Successful MENA Anti-corruption Strategies. Arab Reform Initiative.
Naidoo, V. (2013). The politics of anti-corruption enforcement in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 524-542.
Okpala, K. E., & Christopher, E. (2018). War against Corruption in Nigerian Public Sector: An Analysis of Stakeholders' Role. Research Gate.
Open Society Foundations. (2015). Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies inEast Africa. Open Society Foundations.
Osrecki, F. (2015). Fighting Corruption with Transparent Organisations: A Corruption and Functional Deviance in Organisational Behaviour. Ephemera Journal. 15(2), 337-364.
Taylor, M.M. (2017). What US Policy Makers Can Learn From Brazil's Anticorruption Gains. Council on Foreign Relations. USA
Transparency International. (2020). U.S Hits new Low in Global Corruption Index. Transparency International.
Demidov, V., Mokhorov, D., Mokhorova, A., & Askarov, Z. (2021). International Legal Problems of Fighting Corruption in the Context of Geopolitical Integration. International Political Geography, 313-326.
UNODC. (2008). Corruption Facts . UNODC.
Wilson, A. J. (2013). Comparative Political Corruption in the UnitedStates: The Florida Perspective.University of South Florida Scholar Commons.
Gonzalo, F. (2013). Existing Practices on Anti-corruption. Economic and Private Sector. United Kingdom
Onuigbo, R.A. (2015). Analyses of Legal Framework for Fighting Corruption in Nigeria: Problems and Challenges. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 5(3),1-33.
Brzezinka, J., Chrysostome, E., & Gola, J. (2018). Corruption and Management of Capacity Building in Developing and Emerging Countries: A Critical Overview. Journal of Comparative International Management. 21(1), 9-26.
Transparency International (2014). Corruption as a Threat to Stability and Peace. ISBN: 978-3-944827-03-2.
Hlongwane, P. (2018). The Anti-Corruption Institutions in South Africa: A panacea to governance ills? Southern African Public Law. 33 (2), 12-21.
Routledge, D. (2013). Fighting Corruption in Eastern Europe: A Multilevel Perspective. Europe.
Prateeppornnarong, D. (2020). Fighting Corruption while having hands tied: A case study of Thailand’s Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission. Journal of Asian and African Studies. 38(1), 3-14.
Boly, A., & Gillanders, R. (2018). Anti-corruption policy making, discretionary power and institutional quality: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation. 152, 314-327.