VIABILITY OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN KENYA

A COST- BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE NAIROBI EXPRESS-WAY

  • DEBORAH ROBI MWISE Kenyatta University, Kenya
  • WELDON K. NG’ENO, PhD Kenyatta University, Kenya
Keywords: Public Private Partnership, Costs and Benefit Analysis, Risk Management

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the viability of public-private partnerships in Kenya: a case of Nairobi express-way cost-benefit analysis. Specifically, the study examines the costs and benefit analysis of the Nairobi Expressway Public private partnership project to the government, costs and benefit analysis of the Nairobi Expressway Public private partnership project to the users and assessing how risk distribution among stakeholders affect the Nairobi expressway Public private partnership project. The theoretical basis for this study is resource dependency theory. Descriptive research methods, including the use of visual aids to clarify the data distribution was used to collect and evaluate event data in this study. This research investigated a target population of 1200 persons. The study used a sample size of 120 people. Semi structured questionnaires were used to collect. The Cronbach's alpha procedures were used to assess the instruments' reliability. The reliability of a research instrument was judged according to whether or not the coefficient is 0.70 or higher. A larger absolute value indicates greater consistency across the spectrum. The researcher's supervisor will do a thorough assessment of the tool. Descriptive statistics was used to analyses quantitative data is made easier with the help of SPSS. Frequency tables, bar graphs, and pie charts were used to illustrate the results. In order to safeguard the rights and confidentiality of the participants, the study will publicly address ethical concerns. The researcher asked for written consent by respondents. The significance, goals, length, voluntary nature, at will withdrawal, privacy and confidentiality protections, and point of contact for queries and concerns will all be explained to the participants. The study findings revealed that cost benefit analysis to government had positive significant effect on changes in viability of public private partnerships in Kenya. The findings also indicated that cost benefit analysis to users have positive effect in changes in viability of public private partnerships in Kenya. Again, the result indicates that   Risk distribution among stakeholders had a positive effect on changes in viability of public private partnerships in Kenya.

Author Biographies

DEBORAH ROBI MWISE, Kenyatta University, Kenya

Master of Arts in Public Policy and Administration, School of Law, Arts and Social Sciences, Kenyatta University, Kenya

WELDON K. NG’ENO, PhD, Kenyatta University, Kenya

Lecturer, Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University, Kenya

References

Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American review of public administration, 38(2), 130-148.

Bahta, T. H. (2017). Conflicting Legal Regimes vying for application: The old Administrative Contracts Law or The Modern Public Procurement Law for Ethiopia. African Public Procurement Law Journal, 4(1).

Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, L., & Lawrence, A. (2021). Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Guide for Policy and Project Evaluation. Routledge.

Hellowell, M. (2010). The UK’s Private Finance Initiative: history, evaluation, prospects. In International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Jomo, K. S., Chowdhury, A., Sharma, K., & Platz, D. (2016). Public-private partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: fit for purpose? 

Keating, B. P., & Keating, M. O. (2017). Basic cost benefit analysis for assessing local public projects. Business Expert Press.

Kipkirui, R., & Gitau, G. (2019). Sustainability of Public Private Partnerships in Kenya: A multi-criteria analysis approach. Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(3), 1-11. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 4(2), 78-89.

Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to terms with the public-private partnership: A grammar of multiple meanings. American behavioral scientist, 43(1), 35-51.

Mutisya, J., Kariuki, J., & Kamau, D. (2018). Social cost-benefit analysis of the Nairobi Expressway PPP. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 12(2), 1-8

Owino, O. (2019). Long-term sustainability of public-private partnerships: The case of the Nairobi Expressway. Journal of Infrastructure and Development, 5(2), 83-91.

Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (2016). Fiscal risks associated with PPPs. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility Reports, 1(2), 23-34.

Savas, E. S. (1982). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, J: Chatham House Publishers.

Tang, L., & Shen, Q. (2013). Stakeholder management in public-private partnerships: a review of the literature. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(2), 170- 181.

Vining, A.R., & Boardman, A.E. (2005). Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Published
2024-06-04
Section
Articles